FDEM vs. SMST

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. FDEM is passively managed, while SMST is actively managed. Over the past year, FDEM returned 26.06% vs 257.89% for SMST. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.

Performance

FDEM vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -31.71% return.

FDEM

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -5.85%
• 6M: 8.28%
• YTD: 14.03%
• 1Y: 26.06%
• 3Y*: 19.15%
• 5Y*: 8.60%
• 10Y*: —

SMST

• 1D: 7.64%
• 1M: 37.45%
• 6M: -8.12%
• YTD: -31.71%
• 1Y: 257.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	14.03%	26.75%	-1.39%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	-31.71%	-44.36%	-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and SMST is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.35

Return for Risk

FDEM vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM

FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 46
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SMST

SMST Risk / Return Rank: 63
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDEM	SMST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.74	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.38	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	3.04	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.06	5.82	+1.25

FDEM vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and SMST.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEM	SMST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.65%	-99.25%	+65.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.70%	-85.39%	+72.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.34%	-97.32%	+88.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-90.93%	+82.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.70%	44.56%	-40.86%

Volatility

FDEM vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is 8.55%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 55.38%. This indicates that FDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEM	SMST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.55%	55.38%	-46.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.79%	135.32%	-116.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.57%	149.40%	-128.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	167.53%	-150.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	167.53%	-149.25%

FDEM vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEM vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	3.07%	3.23%	4.05%	4.41%	3.95%	2.71%	1.84%	2.39%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEM and SMST in my portfolio?

FDEM and SMST have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDEM or SMST?

SMST has higher volatility (55.38%) compared to FDEM (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs SMST's -99.25%.

Which ETF is better, FDEM or SMST?

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 257.89% vs 26.06% for FDEM. On fees, FDEM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDEM or SMST?

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 257.89% return vs 26.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDEM or SMST?

FDEM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDEM or SMST?

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

What is the main difference between FDEM and SMST?

FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 1.29% for SMST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.