PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEM vs. SCHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEM vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 11.88% return.


FDEM

1D
-1.46%
1M
7.69%
YTD
22.58%
6M
24.26%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

SCHE

1D
-1.45%
1M
2.69%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.88%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
22.58%26.75%9.34%17.26%-13.11%-3.52%8.87%5.73%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
11.88%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and SCHE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.90

The correlation between FDEM and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEM vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDEM
SCHE

Technology

31.8%
30.8%

Financial Services

16.3%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
8.9%

Communication Services

10.6%
5.2%

Energy

8.3%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

5.2%
1.0%

Industrials

4.8%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.9%

Healthcare

-

2.8%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

FDEM
31.8%
SCHE
30.8%

Financial Services

FDEM
16.3%
SCHE
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDEM
12.2%
SCHE
8.9%

Communication Services

FDEM
10.6%
SCHE
5.2%

Energy

FDEM
8.3%
SCHE
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

FDEM
7.6%
SCHE
2.0%

Real Estate

FDEM
5.2%
SCHE
1.0%

Industrials

FDEM
4.8%
SCHE
4.9%

Basic Materials

FDEM
3.2%
SCHE
3.9%

Healthcare

FDEM

-

SCHE
2.8%

Utilities

FDEM

-

SCHE
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEM vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM
FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEMSCHEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.72

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.12

9.82

+4.30

FDEM vs. SCHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the SCHE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and SCHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEMSCHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.89

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.28

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.25

+0.28

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum SCHE drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and SCHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEMSCHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-36.20%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-11.29%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-17.08%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-33.59%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-1.45%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-12.60%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.12%

+0.11%

Volatility

FDEM vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) at 5.80%. This indicates that FDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEMSCHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

5.80%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

13.58%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

16.26%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

17.67%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

19.46%

-1.55%

FDEM vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEM vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than SCHE's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
2.66%3.23%4.05%4.41%3.95%2.71%1.84%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.57%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FDEM and SCHE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDEM has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to SCHE (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs SCHE's -36.20%.

On 5-year performance, FDEM leads with 9.43% vs 4.94% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDEM has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.57% for SCHE.

FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while SCHE tracks FTSE All-World Emerging. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.11% for SCHE.

FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEM and SCHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer