PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEM vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEM vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 13.78% return.


FDEM

1D
0.22%
1M
0.88%
YTD
20.05%
6M
22.29%
1Y
38.42%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*

LVHI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.84%
YTD
13.78%
6M
14.96%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
20.05%26.75%9.34%17.26%-13.11%-3.52%8.87%5.60%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.78%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and LVHI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.53

The correlation between FDEM and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEM vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDEM
LVHI

Technology

38.5%
0.1%

Financial Services

15.0%
24.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
5.5%

Communication Services

9.6%
5.8%

Energy

7.3%
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
8.6%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.8%

Industrials

4.4%
13.4%

Basic Materials

2.7%
6.8%

Healthcare

-

7.4%

Utilities

-

10.0%

Technology

FDEM
38.5%
LVHI
0.1%

Financial Services

FDEM
15.0%
LVHI
24.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FDEM
11.5%
LVHI
5.5%

Communication Services

FDEM
9.6%
LVHI
5.8%

Energy

FDEM
7.3%
LVHI
16.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDEM
6.5%
LVHI
8.6%

Real Estate

FDEM
4.6%
LVHI
1.8%

Industrials

FDEM
4.4%
LVHI
13.4%

Basic Materials

FDEM
2.7%
LVHI
6.8%

Healthcare

FDEM

-

LVHI
7.4%

Utilities

FDEM

-

LVHI
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEM vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM
FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDEMLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.63

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

5.23

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

21.61

-10.77

FDEM vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEMLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-32.31%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-6.08%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-11.99%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.47%

-11.99%

-16.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

0.00%

-3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-3.51%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.48%

+1.89%

Volatility

FDEM vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.78%. This indicates that FDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEMLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

2.78%

+6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.93%

7.72%

+9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.94%

9.60%

+9.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

11.08%

+5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

13.75%

+4.35%

FDEM vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEM vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than LVHI's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
2.72%3.23%4.05%4.41%3.95%2.71%1.84%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.69%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEM and LVHI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEM has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 9.14% for FDEM. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.72% for FDEM.

FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEM and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer