FDEM vs. FUTY
FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEM returned 9.43%/yr vs 9.13%/yr for FUTY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FUTY.
Performance
FDEM vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 3.16% return.
FDEM
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 22.58%
- 6M
- 24.26%
- 1Y
- 45.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
FUTY
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 9.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
FDEM vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 22.58% | 26.75% | 9.34% | 17.26% | -13.11% | -3.52% | 8.87% | 5.73% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 3.16% | 16.40% | 23.20% | -7.46% | 1.12% | 17.53% | -0.80% | 15.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEM and FUTY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019 | 0.24 |
FDEM vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDEM
FUTY
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDEM
FUTY
-
Financial Services
FDEM
FUTY
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDEM
FUTY
-
Communication Services
FDEM
FUTY
-
Energy
FDEM
FUTY
Consumer Defensive
FDEM
FUTY
-
Real Estate
FDEM
FUTY
-
Industrials
FDEM
FUTY
Basic Materials
FDEM
FUTY
-
Healthcare
FDEM
-
FUTY
-
Utilities
FDEM
-
FUTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDEM vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank
FDEM
FUTY
FDEM vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEM | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.12 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 1.07 | +2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 2.41 | +11.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEM | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 0.67 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.54 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.55 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
FDEM vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and FUTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEM | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -36.44% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -8.93% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.04% | -17.35% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -25.11% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -7.28% | +5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -6.03% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.97% | -0.74% |
Volatility
FDEM vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) at 5.45%. This indicates that FDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDEM | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 5.45% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.03% | 11.40% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 14.33% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 17.08% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 19.05% | -1.14% |
FDEM vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDEM vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison
FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than FUTY's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 2.66% | 3.23% | 4.05% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.61% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDEM and FUTY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDEM has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FUTY (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs FUTY's -36.44%.
On 5-year performance, FDEM leads with 9.43% vs 9.13% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FUTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDEM has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.
FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.61% for FUTY.
FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.08% for FUTY.
FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDEM and FUTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer