PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEM vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEM vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


FDEM

1D
-1.46%
1M
7.69%
YTD
22.58%
6M
24.26%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
22.58%26.75%0.03%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and FETH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEM vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM
FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEMFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.97

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

-0.51

+4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.12

-0.84

+14.96

FDEM vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEM and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEMFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

-0.47

+3.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.41

+0.94

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEMFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-64.00%

+30.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-62.95%

+50.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-62.95%

+61.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-32.73%

+23.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

37.82%

-34.59%

Volatility

FDEM vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) is 7.26%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEMFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

9.99%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

46.01%

-30.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

68.50%

-51.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

72.27%

-56.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

72.27%

-54.36%

FDEM vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEM vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
2.66%3.23%4.05%4.41%3.95%2.71%1.84%2.39%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDEM and FETH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FDEM (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FDEM leads with 45.52% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FDEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDEM has performed better with a 45.52% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.00% for FETH.

FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEM and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer