FDEGX vs. PULS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FDEGX (Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both funds - FDEGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, FDEGX returned 8.01%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for PULS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDEGX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.

Performance

FDEGX vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEGX achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than PULS's 1.88% return.

FDEGX

• 1D: 4.34%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 5.89%
• 3Y*: 16.71%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 12.37%

PULS

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.10%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 4.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEGX vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	11.15%	2.88%	26.57%	20.93%	-26.50%	21.30%	29.34%	36.59%	-7.46%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.88%	4.97%	6.12%	6.26%	1.52%	0.48%	1.47%	2.97%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEGX and PULS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018	0.08

The correlation between FDEGX and PULS shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FDEGX vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEGX

FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 6
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 99
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEGX vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDEGX	PULS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	11.41	-11.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	32.91	-32.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	7.59	-6.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	52.47	-52.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.58	317.38	-316.80

FDEGX vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 11.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEGX and PULS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDEGX vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEGX drawdown since its inception was -85.96%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEGX and PULS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEGX	PULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.96%	-5.85%	-80.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.45%	-0.09%	-20.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.04%	-0.34%	-25.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.62%	-0.79%	-35.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.67%	0.00%	-4.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.80%	-0.09%	-36.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.05%	0.01%	+8.04%

Volatility

FDEGX vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that FDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEGX	PULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.97%	0.11%	+7.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.80%	0.30%	+19.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.76%	0.41%	+22.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.46%	0.70%	+22.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.12%	1.33%	+20.79%

FDEGX vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEGX vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	7.89%	0.05%	0.00%	14.15%	8.37%	3.65%	0.75%	0.05%	0.59%	0.13%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.57%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEGX and PULS in my portfolio?

FDEGX and PULS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDEGX or PULS?

FDEGX has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEGX dropped -85.96% vs PULS's -5.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.41 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.