FDEGX vs. EVTR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FDEGX (Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund) and EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) are both funds - FDEGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while EVTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past year, FDEGX returned 1.60% vs 5.42% for EVTR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDEGX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EVTR.

Performance

FDEGX vs. EVTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEGX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than EVTR's -0.18% return.

FDEGX

• 1D: -3.58%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 6M: -1.97%
• 1Y: 1.60%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

EVTR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEGX vs. EVTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	8.51%	2.88%	12.48%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	-0.18%	8.10%	4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEGX and EVTR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.22

The correlation between FDEGX and EVTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FDEGX vs. EVTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEGX

FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 45
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEGX vs. EVTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDEGX	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	1.50	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	2.20	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.26	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	1.90	-1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.37	5.94	-5.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDEGX vs. EVTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the EVTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEGX and EVTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDEGX	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	1.50	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	1.26	-0.87

Drawdowns

FDEGX vs. EVTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEGX drawdown since its inception was -85.96%, which is greater than EVTR's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEGX and EVTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEGX	EVTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.96%	-4.08%	-81.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.45%	-2.86%	-17.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.93%	-1.90%	-5.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.82%	-0.97%	-35.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.01%	0.91%	+7.10%

Volatility

FDEGX vs. EVTR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) at 1.40%. This indicates that FDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEGX	EVTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.56%	1.40%	+5.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.21%	2.81%	+16.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	3.64%	+18.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.35%	4.31%	+19.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.07%	4.31%	+17.76%

FDEGX vs. EVTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than EVTR's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEGX vs. EVTR - Dividend Comparison

FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.70%	4.51%	4.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	7.89%	0.05%	0.00%	14.15%	8.37%	3.65%	0.75%	0.05%	0.59%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEGX and EVTR in my portfolio?

FDEGX and EVTR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDEGX or EVTR?

FDEGX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to EVTR (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEGX dropped -85.96% vs EVTR's -4.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.