PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEC vs. BGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDEC vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDEC vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDEC
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
-2.86%14.82%14.32%22.76%-9.18%12.57%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
0.18%33.03%21.80%13.24%-2.42%-5.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEC achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than BGLD's 0.18% return.


FDEC

1D
2.01%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
0.97%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*

BGLD

1D
2.63%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
2.66%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDEC vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDEC vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEC
FDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEC vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDECBGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.37

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

1.89

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.51

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.02

7.80

+1.21

FDEC vs. BGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the BGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEC and BGLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDECBGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.37

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

1.24

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.09

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between FDEC and BGLD is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FDEC vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison

FDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.24%.


TTM2025202420232022
FDEC
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
44.24%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%

Drawdowns

FDEC vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEC drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, roughly equal to the maximum BGLD drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEC and BGLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDECBGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-16.19%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-11.11%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.67%

-16.19%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-7.35%

+3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-3.54%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.15%

-0.46%

Volatility

FDEC vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) is 3.74%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that FDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDECBGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

6.83%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

9.28%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

12.06%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.20%

9.88%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.12%

9.87%

+1.25%