PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCPX vs. STK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDCPX vs. STK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCPX achieves a 84.16% return, which is significantly higher than STK's 59.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FDCPX has outperformed STK with an annualized return of 28.33%, while STK has yielded a comparatively lower 24.60% annualized return.


FDCPX

1D
2.20%
1M
25.35%
YTD
84.16%
6M
86.77%
1Y
143.33%
3Y*
57.11%
5Y*
29.98%
10Y*
28.33%

STK

1D
-0.19%
1M
17.70%
YTD
59.80%
6M
57.03%
1Y
116.50%
3Y*
37.51%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
24.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCPX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDCPX
Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio
84.16%54.44%22.40%33.52%-28.63%23.68%46.07%40.15%-6.30%32.64%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
59.80%24.85%17.74%46.60%-30.36%48.63%25.39%52.73%-14.91%33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCPX and STK is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2009

0.66

The correlation between FDCPX and STK shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDCPX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCPX
FDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

STK
STK Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCPX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDCPXSTKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.14

5.11

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.41

5.87

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.80

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

15.12

9.12

+6.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

58.21

38.55

+19.67

FDCPX vs. STK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCPX Sharpe Ratio is 6.14, which is comparable to the STK Sharpe Ratio of 5.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCPX and STK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDCPXSTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14

5.11

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.34

0.88

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.30

0.94

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.76

-0.19

Drawdowns

FDCPX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCPX drawdown since its inception was -81.96%, which is greater than STK's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCPX and STK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCPXSTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.96%

-41.74%

-40.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-12.84%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.59%

-26.59%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.29%

-36.27%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.29%

-41.74%

+6.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-7.41%

-18.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.03%

-0.52%

Volatility

FDCPX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) have volatilities of 8.07% and 8.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDCPXSTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.07%

8.47%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

18.91%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.87%

22.93%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

25.10%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

26.13%

-4.22%

FDCPX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDCPX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison

FDCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than STK's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDCPX
Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio
5.81%14.38%7.58%0.51%17.72%16.95%8.81%12.15%23.69%10.50%6.57%4.53%
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund
4.72%7.38%16.02%6.70%12.62%8.48%6.79%7.86%14.88%11.82%9.87%10.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDCPX and STK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STK has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to FDCPX (8.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCPX dropped -81.96% vs STK's -41.74%.

FDCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.14 vs 5.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDCPX and STK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer