PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDCF vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDCF vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDCF achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.72% return.


FDCF

1D
-1.74%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.52%
1Y
14.71%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
10Y*

FBND

1D
0.11%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.80%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
0.79%
10Y*
2.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDCF vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
0.53%27.42%28.37%17.50%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.72%7.57%2.13%4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FDCF and FBND is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2023

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDCF vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDCF
FDCF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FDCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCF Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDCF vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDCFFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

1.77

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

5.07

-2.65

FDCF vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDCF and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDCF vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCF drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCF and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDCFFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-17.25%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.10%

-2.66%

-15.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

-5.94%

-16.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.62%

-1.21%

-5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-3.34%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

0.93%

+5.14%

Volatility

FDCF vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF (FDCF) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.13%. This indicates that FDCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDCFFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

1.13%

+6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

2.84%

+12.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.26%

3.83%

+15.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

5.93%

+14.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

6.10%

+14.63%

FDCF vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDCF vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FDCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than FBND's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.69%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
0.07%0.09%0.25%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDCF and FBND have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDCF has higher volatility (7.32%) compared to FBND (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDCF dropped -22.53% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 3-year performance, FDCF leads with 24.69% vs 4.73% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FDCF has performed better with a 24.69% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDCF.

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.07% for FDCF.

FDCF is categorized as Communications Equities, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDCF and 0.36% for FBND.

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDCF and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer