FDAT vs. DWAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDAT (Tactical Advantage ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDAT is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Tactical Funds, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. FDAT charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.

Performance

FDAT vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FDAT

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 3.66%
• 1Y: 11.57%
• 3Y*: 9.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DWAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAT vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	-0.46%
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%

FDAT vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDAT	DWAT
Financial Services	22.5%	27.2%
Industrials	21.8%	25.1%
Technology	14.9%	10.2%
Basic Materials	9.2%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	5.2%
Energy	7.8%	4.2%
Real Estate	5.4%	5.1%
Healthcare	3.2%	5.3%
Utilities	2.8%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	6.5%
Communication Services	1.7%	3.4%

Return for Risk

FDAT vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAT

FDAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAT vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDAT	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDAT	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	—	—

Drawdowns

FDAT vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and DWAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDAT	DWAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	0.00%	-8.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	0.00%	-2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	0.00%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDAT	DWAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.89%	0.00%	+9.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.47%	0.00%	+9.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.47%	0.00%	+9.47%

FDAT vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDAT vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	5.64%	4.77%	8.99%	1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FDAT or DWAT?

On fees, FDAT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDAT or DWAT?

FDAT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDAT or DWAT?

FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

What is the main difference between FDAT and DWAT?

FDAT is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 1.83% for DWAT.