FDAAX vs. BGT
FDAAX (Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund) and BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, FDAAX returned 4.26%/yr vs 6.51%/yr for BGT. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FDAAX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for BGT.
Performance
FDAAX vs. BGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDAAX achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than BGT's 3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FDAAX has underperformed BGT with an annualized return of 4.26%, while BGT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.51% annualized return.
FDAAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.87%
BGT
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- -3.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.59M | $1.30M | $1.18M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FDAAX vs. BGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAAX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund | 1.38% | 4.68% | 8.52% | 14.35% | -1.37% | 8.55% | -3.71% | 3.30% | 0.95% | 2.44% |
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 3.20% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDAAX and BGT is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2004 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDAAX vs. BGT — Risk / Return Rank
FDAAX
BGT
FDAAX vs. BGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDAAX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.96 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.25 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | -0.52 | +5.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDAAX vs. BGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDAAX drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, smaller than the maximum BGT drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAAX and BGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDAAX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -58.06% | +32.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.73% | -11.06% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.70% | -15.91% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.22% | -23.19% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.08% | -41.90% | +23.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -3.09% | +2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -8.10% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 5.41% | -4.80% |
Volatility
FDAAX vs. BGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) is 0.34%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that FDAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDAAX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | 3.08% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.08% | 7.43% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01% | 9.95% | -6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 13.60% | -10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.85% | 15.35% | -11.50% |
FDAAX vs. BGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDAAX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than BGT's 1.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDAAX vs. BGT - Dividend Comparison
FDAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, less than BGT's 13.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.33% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
FDAAX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund | 7.24% | 8.00% | 9.42% | 7.64% | 5.84% | 3.73% | 5.07% | 5.62% | 5.18% | 3.79% | 4.57% | 4.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDAAX and BGT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGT has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to FDAAX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAAX dropped -25.74% vs BGT's -58.06%.
FDAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDAAX and BGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer