FDAAX vs. BGT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FDAAX (Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund) and BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, FDAAX returned 4.44%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for BGT. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDAAX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for BGT.

Performance

FDAAX vs. BGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAAX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than BGT's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FDAAX has underperformed BGT with an annualized return of 4.44%, while BGT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.20% annualized return.

FDAAX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 1.24%
• 1Y: 3.62%
• 3Y*: 7.65%
• 5Y*: 6.15%
• 10Y*: 4.44%

BGT

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: -1.48%
• 3Y*: 10.59%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: 6.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAAX vs. BGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDAAX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund	1.17%	4.68%	8.52%	14.35%	-1.37%	8.55%	-3.71%	3.30%	0.95%	2.44%
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust	0.16%	-0.84%	16.12%	26.29%	-16.57%	25.89%	-0.81%	18.97%	-11.95%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAAX and BGT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2004	0.16

Return for Risk

FDAAX vs. BGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAAX

FDAAX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FDAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FDAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FDAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FDAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FDAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BGT

BGT Risk / Return Rank: 2
BGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BGT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAAX vs. BGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDAAX	BGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	-0.14	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	-0.13	+2.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.98	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	-0.06	+2.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.22	-0.14	+7.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDAAX vs. BGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the BGT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDAAX and BGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDAAX	BGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	-0.14	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.85	0.52	+1.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.16	0.41	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	0.29	+0.94

Drawdowns

FDAAX vs. BGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAAX drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, smaller than the maximum BGT drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAAX and BGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDAAX	BGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.74%	-58.06%	+32.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.73%	-11.06%	+9.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.70%	-15.91%	+13.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.22%	-23.19%	+16.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.08%	-41.90%	+23.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.95%	+5.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-8.12%	+6.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	4.97%	-4.38%

Volatility

FDAAX vs. BGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund (FDAAX) is 0.87%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that FDAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDAAX	BGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.87%	2.43%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.47%	7.15%	-4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99%	10.37%	-7.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.34%	13.57%	-10.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.85%	15.34%	-11.49%

FDAAX vs. BGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAAX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than BGT's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDAAX vs. BGT - Dividend Comparison

FDAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, less than BGT's 13.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust	13.43%	12.74%	11.22%	10.36%	6.87%	5.55%	7.58%	6.33%	6.64%	5.03%	5.03%	6.04%
FDAAX Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund	7.86%	8.00%	9.42%	7.64%	5.84%	3.73%	5.07%	5.62%	5.18%	3.79%	4.57%	4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDAAX and BGT in my portfolio?

FDAAX and BGT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDAAX or BGT?

BGT has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to FDAAX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAAX dropped -25.74% vs BGT's -58.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.