FCXG vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FCXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FCXG is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

FCXG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FCXG

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -16.29%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 2.79%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 1Y: 14.91%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCXG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FCXG Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF	-16.00%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FCXG and XDSQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

FCXG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCXG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 50
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCXG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCXG	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.32	—

Drawdowns

FCXG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCXG	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.55%	-26.06%	-18.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.38%	0.00%	-32.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.99%	-4.87%	-17.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCXG	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.14%	10.53%	+98.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.14%	15.27%	+93.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	109.14%	14.96%	+94.18%

FCXG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCXG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FCXG nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCXG and XDSQ in my portfolio?

FCXG and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCXG or XDSQ?

On fees, FCXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCXG or XDSQ?

FCXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCXG or XDSQ?

FCXG and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FCXG and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FCXG and 0.79% for XDSQ.