PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCXG vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCXG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCXG

1D
-2.59%
1M
41.30%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPUU

1D
0.70%
1M
9.03%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.95%
1Y
54.50%
3Y*
38.69%
5Y*
20.36%
10Y*
24.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCXG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCXG and SPUU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCXG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCXG

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCXG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCXG vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCXGSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.64

-0.28

Drawdowns

FCXG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCXGSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-59.35%

+14.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-0.58%

-8.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-9.50%

-11.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

Volatility

FCXG vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCXGSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.09%

23.88%

+85.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.09%

33.46%

+75.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.09%

35.76%

+73.33%

FCXG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCXG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

FCXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCXG
Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.33%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCXG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FCXG.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for FCXG.

FCXG tracks Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FCXG and 0.64% for SPUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCXG and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer