FCXG vs. SPUU
FCXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FCXG tracks the Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) while SPUU tracks the S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
FCXG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCXG
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- YTD
- 16.72%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 31.33%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $223.64K | $203.00K | $533.52K | |
| $4.20M | $4.55M | $4.33M |
FCXG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCXG Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF | -14.53% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCXG and SPUU is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCXG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
FCXG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPUU
FCXG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCXG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCXG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCXG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -59.35% | +14.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.19% | -3.83% | -27.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.43% | -9.44% | -13.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.51% | — |
Volatility
FCXG vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCXG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.68% | 25.88% | +81.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.68% | 33.70% | +73.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.68% | 35.79% | +71.89% |
FCXG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCXG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
FCXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCXG Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.34% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCXG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FCXG.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for FCXG.
FCXG tracks Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FCXG and 0.60% for SPUU.
Find the right allocation for FCXG and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer