PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCXG vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCXG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCXG

1D
-2.59%
1M
41.30%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-2.08%
1M
0.88%
YTD
549.02%
6M
433.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCXG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FCXG and LINT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCXG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF (FCXG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCXG vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCXGLINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

22.52

-22.16

Drawdowns

FCXG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCXG drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCXG and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCXGLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-49.54%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-28.08%

+19.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-20.57%

-0.55%

Volatility

FCXG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCXGLINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.09%

162.52%

-53.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.09%

162.52%

-53.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.09%

162.52%

-53.43%

FCXG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCXG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

FCXG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FCXG and LINT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for FCXG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FCXG and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCXG and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer