PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVT vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVT vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 25.61% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 3.08% return.


FCVT

1D
-1.20%
1M
7.08%
YTD
25.61%
6M
25.00%
1Y
47.07%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
12.36%

PFFA

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.08%
6M
4.03%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVT vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
25.61%19.60%11.92%7.12%-20.88%4.23%51.02%22.30%-6.96%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
3.08%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVT and PFFA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.50

The correlation between FCVT and PFFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCVT vs. PFFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCVT
PFFA

Utilities

1.3%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
0.2%

Financial Services

0.7%
28.1%

Healthcare

0.7%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

5.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.2%

Industrials

-

10.2%

Real Estate

-

41.2%

Technology

-

3.0%

Utilities

FCVT
1.3%
PFFA
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FCVT
0.7%
PFFA
0.2%

Financial Services

FCVT
0.7%
PFFA
28.1%

Healthcare

FCVT
0.7%
PFFA
0.9%

Basic Materials

FCVT

-

PFFA
0.3%

Communication Services

FCVT

-

PFFA
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

FCVT

-

PFFA

-

Energy

FCVT

-

PFFA
3.2%

Industrials

FCVT

-

PFFA
10.2%

Real Estate

FCVT

-

PFFA
41.2%

Technology

FCVT

-

PFFA
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVT vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVT
FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVT vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCVTPFFADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.97

2.12

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

3.00

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.40

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.58

2.29

+3.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.90

7.79

+13.11

FCVT vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVT and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCVTPFFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.12

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.24

+0.44

Drawdowns

FCVT vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-70.52%

+38.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-6.49%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-12.15%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

-22.70%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.50%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-6.65%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.90%

+0.36%

Volatility

FCVT vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 1.87%. This indicates that FCVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

1.87%

+4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

5.68%

+7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

7.02%

+8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.09%

11.51%

+2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.85%

31.84%

-16.99%

FCVT vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVT vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than PFFA's 9.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
1.19%1.98%1.30%1.76%3.71%23.07%1.72%1.60%1.85%2.18%1.88%0.59%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.62%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVT and PFFA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVT has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to PFFA (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

On 5-year performance, FCVT leads with 7.58% vs 6.57% for PFFA. On fees, FCVT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, PFFA has been the lower-risk option at 1.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FCVT has performed better with a 7.58% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCVT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.62%, compared with 1.19% for FCVT.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 1.47% for PFFA.

FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVT and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer