FCVT vs. GRID

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) and GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) are both exchange-traded funds - FCVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. FCVT is actively managed, while GRID is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FCVT returned 12.36%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for GRID. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCVT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.

Performance

FCVT vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 25.61% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVT has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 12.36%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.76% annualized return.

FCVT

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 7.08%
• YTD: 25.61%
• 6M: 25.00%
• 1Y: 47.07%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 12.36%

GRID

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 28.91%
• 6M: 29.60%
• 1Y: 51.55%
• 3Y*: 26.27%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: 19.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVT vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	25.61%	19.60%	11.92%	7.12%	-20.88%	4.23%	51.02%	22.30%	-2.28%	12.66%
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index	28.91%	29.65%	15.18%	21.57%	-13.89%	27.65%	48.84%	42.80%	-22.69%	27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVT and GRID is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2015	0.63

The correlation between FCVT and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCVT vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCVT	GRID
Utilities	1.3%	20.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	3.5%
Financial Services	0.7%	-
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	65.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	11.0%

Return for Risk

FCVT vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVT

FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 87
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

GRID

GRID Risk / Return Rank: 79
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVT vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCVT	GRID	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	2.67	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	3.50	+0.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.45	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.58	4.42	+1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.90	16.72	+4.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCVT vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVT and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCVT	GRID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	2.67	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.85	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.87	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.57	+0.11

Drawdowns

FCVT vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and GRID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCVT	GRID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.79%	-40.56%	+8.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.47%	-11.73%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.06%	-20.77%	+5.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.43%	-29.64%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.79%	-40.56%	+8.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-1.33%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.36%	-8.43%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	3.09%	-0.83%

Volatility

FCVT vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) is 6.07%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that FCVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCVT	GRID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	7.95%	-1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.99%	16.08%	-3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	19.39%	-3.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.09%	21.00%	-6.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	22.81%	-7.96%

FCVT vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCVT vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF	1.19%	1.98%	1.30%	1.76%	3.71%	23.07%	1.72%	1.60%	1.85%	2.18%	1.88%	0.59%
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index	0.77%	1.01%	1.06%	1.23%	1.26%	0.63%	0.68%	1.26%	1.28%	1.07%	1.07%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCVT and GRID in my portfolio?

FCVT and GRID have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCVT or GRID?

GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to FCVT (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs GRID's -40.56%.

Which ETF is better, FCVT or GRID?

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.76% vs 12.36% for FCVT. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FCVT has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCVT or GRID?

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCVT or GRID?

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCVT or GRID?

FCVT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.

What is the main difference between FCVT and GRID?

FCVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 0.70% for GRID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.