PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVT vs. FEMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVT vs. FEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than FEMB's 2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVT has outperformed FEMB with an annualized return of 10.87%, while FEMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.


FCVT

1D
0.19%
1M
-4.59%
6M
8.08%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
10.52%

FEMB

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.67%
6M
-0.39%
YTD
2.20%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
1.90%
ALL TIME*
1.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.38M$2.19M$1.42M
$2.81M$3.29M$2.60M

FCVT vs. FEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
14.79%19.60%11.92%7.12%-20.88%4.23%51.02%22.30%-2.28%12.66%
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
2.20%21.77%-5.61%17.12%-10.50%-13.40%3.16%11.52%-7.19%11.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVT and FEMB is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2015

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVT vs. FEMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCVT
FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMB
FEMB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCVT vs. FEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVTFEMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.35

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

3.90

+3.40

FCVT vs. FEMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the FEMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVT and FEMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVT vs. FEMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, roughly equal to the maximum FEMB drawdown of -30.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and FEMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTFEMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-30.44%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-7.58%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-10.13%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

-25.15%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

-30.44%

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.08%

-2.39%

-7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-9.84%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.62%

+0.83%

Volatility

FCVT vs. FEMB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) at 1.79%. This indicates that FCVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTFEMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

1.79%

+5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.06%

6.95%

+9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

8.20%

+10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

10.23%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

10.66%

+4.33%

FCVT vs. FEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVT vs. FEMB - Dividend Comparison

FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than FEMB's 6.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
1.14%1.98%1.30%1.76%3.71%23.07%1.72%1.60%1.85%2.18%1.88%0.59%
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
6.19%5.67%6.09%5.15%6.35%6.12%5.29%5.40%5.86%6.38%5.83%4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVT and FEMB have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVT has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to FEMB (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs FEMB's -30.44%.

On 10-year performance, FCVT leads with 10.87% vs 1.90% for FEMB. On fees, FEMB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FCVT has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 1.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEMB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

FEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 1.14% for FCVT.

FCVT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while FEMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 0.85% for FEMB.

FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVT and FEMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer