PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVCX vs. SSCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVCX vs. SSCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVCX achieves a 24.90% return, which is significantly lower than SSCVX's 27.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCVCX having a 10.31% annualized return and SSCVX not far behind at 9.95%.


FCVCX

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.98%
6M
19.15%
YTD
24.90%
1Y
37.49%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
10.31%
ALL TIME*
9.84%

SSCVX

1D
1.14%
1M
0.52%
6M
19.06%
YTD
27.34%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
9.95%
ALL TIME*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCVCX vs. SSCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVCX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C
24.90%6.93%6.82%16.65%-13.97%36.71%9.98%19.64%-16.02%11.11%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
27.34%5.46%12.33%12.47%-15.35%31.25%9.61%18.76%-13.70%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVCX and SSCVX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004

0.93

The correlation between FCVCX and SSCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVCX vs. SSCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCVCX
FCVCX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FCVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCVX
SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCVCX vs. SSCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVCXSSCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

4.67

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.38

14.87

-3.49

FCVCX vs. SSCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SSCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVCX and SSCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVCX vs. SSCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVCX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum SSCVX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVCX and SSCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVCXSSCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-65.34%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-7.88%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.11%

-29.22%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-29.22%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.31%

-48.87%

+3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-0.38%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-11.79%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.52%

+0.43%

Volatility

FCVCX vs. SSCVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C (FCVCX) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FCVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVCXSSCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

3.30%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

11.93%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

17.30%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

21.04%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.33%

23.35%

-1.02%

FCVCX vs. SSCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVCX has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SSCVX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVCX vs. SSCVX - Dividend Comparison

FCVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.89%, more than SSCVX's 8.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVCX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class C
9.89%12.35%5.46%5.97%7.23%8.53%0.13%3.34%41.61%3.03%7.26%11.44%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
8.61%10.96%20.45%6.56%4.62%6.64%6.45%0.12%7.59%13.50%6.18%12.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVCX and SSCVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVCX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to SSCVX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVCX dropped -58.55% vs SSCVX's -65.34%.

SSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVCX and SSCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer