FCUS vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. FCUS is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

FCUS vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FCUS

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -7.24%
• 6M: -0.92%
• YTD: 17.24%
• 1Y: 43.12%
• 3Y*: 23.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.38%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	$891.93K	$907.74K	$1.11M
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCUS vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	3.43%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

FCUS vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCUS	QQQN
Technology	50.3%	47.3%
Energy	22.8%	-
Industrials	11.7%	8.7%
Basic Materials	10.9%	1.9%
Healthcare	2.6%	19.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	1.4%
Communication Services	2.2%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	2.1%	13.7%
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

FCUS vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 41
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 46

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCUS vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCUS	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.40	—	—

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCUS	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.89%	0.00%	-39.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.87%	0.00%	-21.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	0.00%	-7.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCUS	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.49%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.67%	0.00%	+41.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.09%	0.00%	+32.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.09%	0.00%	+32.09%

FCUS vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUS vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	3.69%	4.33%	11.19%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FCUS or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCUS or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCUS or QQQN?

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between FCUS and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.18% for QQQN.