FCUS vs. QQJG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG).

FCUS and QQJG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCUS is an actively managed fund by Pinnacle. It was launched on Dec 28, 2022. QQJG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 27, 2021.

Performance

FCUS vs. QQJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCUS vs. QQJG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	17.00%	13.69%	30.59%	21.13%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	1.44%	18.05%	14.67%	17.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly higher than QQJG's 1.44% return.

FCUS

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -7.06%
• YTD: 17.00%
• 6M: 19.12%
• 1Y: 64.87%
• 3Y*: 25.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQJG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 27.88%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUS vs. QQJG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQJG's 0.20% expense ratio.

FCUS

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF

QQJG

Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

Return for Risk

FCUS vs. QQJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 86
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QQJG

QQJG Risk / Return Rank: 70
QQJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QQJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QQJG Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQJG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. QQJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCUS	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.30	+0.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	1.90	+0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	1.73	+2.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.53	8.45	+4.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCUS vs. QQJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the QQJG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUS and QQJG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCUS	QQJG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.30	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.17	+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and QQJG is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FCUS vs. QQJG - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than QQJG's 13.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	3.70%	4.33%	11.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQJG Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	13.86%	0.68%	0.65%	0.54%	0.70%	0.08%

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. QQJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than QQJG's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and QQJG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCUS	QQJG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.89%	-36.76%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-14.51%	-3.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.80%	-2.09%	-5.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.83%	-15.84%	+8.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.36%	2.97%	+2.39%

Volatility

FCUS vs. QQJG - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 15.41% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) at 0.00%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCUS	QQJG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.41%	0.00%	+15.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.50%	11.78%	+17.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.89%	21.80%	+13.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.06%	22.12%	+7.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.06%	22.12%	+7.94%