FCUS vs. QMOM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUS is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pinnacle, while QMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCUS returned 37.64%/yr vs 23.22%/yr for QMOM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.

Performance

FCUS vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than QMOM's 24.65% return.

FCUS

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 10.76%
• YTD: 50.06%
• 6M: 52.19%
• 1Y: 96.08%
• 3Y*: 37.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMOM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 6M: 26.71%
• 1Y: 31.51%
• 3Y*: 23.22%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 13.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUS vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	50.06%	13.69%	30.59%	21.13%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	24.65%	2.36%	30.43%	9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and QMOM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2023	0.81

The correlation between FCUS and QMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCUS vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCUS	QMOM
Technology	40.7%	23.9%
Energy	18.2%	5.5%
Industrials	15.3%	37.5%
Basic Materials	10.1%	9.0%
Healthcare	6.2%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	7.4%
Communication Services	2.2%	4.2%
Financial Services	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

FCUS vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 81
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 42
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCUS	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.36	+1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	1.91	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.46	2.50	+2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.54	9.15	+10.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCUS vs. QMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the QMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUS and QMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCUS	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	1.36	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.52	+0.62

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, roughly equal to the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and QMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCUS	QMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.89%	-39.13%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-12.65%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.89%	-26.46%	-13.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-12.92%	+5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	3.45%	+1.48%

Volatility

FCUS vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) at 8.32%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCUS	QMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.14%	8.32%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.37%	19.78%	+5.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.92%	23.30%	+10.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.98%	24.19%	+5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.98%	26.49%	+3.49%

FCUS vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUS vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than QMOM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	2.89%	4.33%	11.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.44%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCUS and QMOM in my portfolio?

FCUS and QMOM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCUS or QMOM?

FCUS has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to QMOM (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUS dropped -39.89% vs QMOM's -39.13%.

Which ETF is better, FCUS or QMOM?

On 3-year performance, FCUS leads with 37.64% vs 23.22% for QMOM. On fees, QMOM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QMOM has been the lower-risk option at 8.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCUS or QMOM?

Over the 3-year period, FCUS has performed better with a 37.64% return vs 23.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCUS or QMOM?

QMOM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCUS or QMOM?

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.44% for QMOM.

What is the main difference between FCUS and QMOM?

FCUS is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.28% for QMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.