FCUS vs. OOSP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUS is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pinnacle, while OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCUS returned 92.36% vs 6.66% for OOSP. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for OOSP.

Performance

FCUS vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 47.20% return, which is significantly higher than OOSP's 2.41% return.

FCUS

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 47.20%
• 6M: 47.58%
• 1Y: 92.36%
• 3Y*: 36.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 6.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUS vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	47.20%	13.69%	16.45%
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	2.41%	7.41%	6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and OOSP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024	-0.12

Return for Risk

FCUS vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 80
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

OOSP

OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 69
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 62
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCUS	OOSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	1.80	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.62	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.37	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.25	5.09	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.78	18.85	-0.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCUS vs. OOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the OOSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUS and OOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCUS	OOSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	1.80	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	2.28	-1.18

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and OOSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCUS	OOSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.89%	-1.31%	-38.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-1.31%	-16.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-0.18%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.54%	-0.20%	-7.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.94%	0.35%	+4.59%

Volatility

FCUS vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 1.17%. This indicates that FCUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCUS	OOSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.15%	1.17%	+8.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.47%	2.23%	+23.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.99%	3.71%	+30.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.98%	3.35%	+26.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.98%	3.35%	+26.63%

FCUS vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCUS vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than OOSP's 6.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	2.94%	4.33%	11.19%
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	6.47%	6.71%	5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCUS and OOSP in my portfolio?

FCUS and OOSP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCUS or OOSP?

FCUS has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to OOSP (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUS dropped -39.89% vs OOSP's -1.31%.

Which ETF is better, FCUS or OOSP?

On 1-year performance, FCUS leads with 92.36% vs 6.66% for OOSP. On fees, FCUS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCUS or OOSP?

Over the 1-year period, FCUS has performed better with a 92.36% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCUS or OOSP?

FCUS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCUS or OOSP?

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 2.94% for FCUS.

What is the main difference between FCUS and OOSP?

FCUS is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.90% for OOSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.