FCUS vs. ARKQ
FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) and ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCUS is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Pinnacle, while ARKQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCUS returned 37.64%/yr vs 39.07%/yr for ARKQ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKQ.
Performance
FCUS vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's 21.08% return.
FCUS
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 50.06%
- 6M
- 52.19%
- 1Y
- 96.08%
- 3Y*
- 37.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKQ
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 23.88%
- 1Y
- 72.69%
- 3Y*
- 39.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 22.53%
FCUS vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 50.06% | 13.69% | 30.59% | 21.13% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 21.08% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCUS and ARKQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FCUS and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCUS vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCUS
ARKQ
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FCUS
ARKQ
Energy
FCUS
ARKQ
Industrials
FCUS
ARKQ
Basic Materials
FCUS
ARKQ
-
Healthcare
FCUS
ARKQ
Consumer Defensive
FCUS
ARKQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCUS
ARKQ
Communication Services
FCUS
ARKQ
Financial Services
FCUS
-
ARKQ
-
Real Estate
FCUS
-
ARKQ
-
Utilities
FCUS
-
ARKQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCUS vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank
FCUS
ARKQ
FCUS vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCUS | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.46 | 3.55 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.54 | 10.75 | +8.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCUS | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.25 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.66 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
FCUS vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and ARKQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCUS | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.89% | -59.89% | +20.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -20.58% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.89% | -30.76% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.47% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -17.24% | +9.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 6.78% | -1.85% |
Volatility
FCUS vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) have volatilities of 10.14% and 10.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCUS | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 10.45% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.37% | 24.44% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.92% | 32.49% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 32.23% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 29.84% | +0.14% |
FCUS vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCUS vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison
FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than ARKQ's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 2.89% | 4.33% | 11.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCUS and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKQ has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to FCUS (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUS dropped -39.89% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.
On 3-year performance, ARKQ leads with 39.07% vs 37.64% for FCUS. On fees, ARKQ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FCUS has been the lower-risk option at 10.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 39.07% return vs 37.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKQ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.
FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.22% for ARKQ.
FCUS is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ARKQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.75% for ARKQ.
FCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCUS and ARKQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer