PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCUS vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCUS achieves a 50.06% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's 21.08% return.


FCUS

1D
0.90%
1M
10.76%
YTD
50.06%
6M
52.19%
1Y
96.08%
3Y*
37.64%
5Y*
10Y*

ARKQ

1D
-2.13%
1M
8.33%
YTD
21.08%
6M
23.88%
1Y
72.69%
3Y*
39.07%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
22.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
50.06%13.69%30.59%21.13%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
21.08%48.81%33.88%40.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FCUS and ARKQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2023

0.74

The correlation between FCUS and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCUS
ARKQ

Technology

40.7%
32.6%

Energy

18.2%
1.9%

Industrials

15.3%
37.1%

Basic Materials

10.1%

-

Healthcare

6.2%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
16.9%

Communication Services

2.2%
8.1%

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.3%

Technology

FCUS
40.7%
ARKQ
32.6%

Energy

FCUS
18.2%
ARKQ
1.9%

Industrials

FCUS
15.3%
ARKQ
37.1%

Basic Materials

FCUS
10.1%
ARKQ

-

Healthcare

FCUS
6.2%
ARKQ
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

FCUS
4.4%
ARKQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

FCUS
2.9%
ARKQ
16.9%

Communication Services

FCUS
2.2%
ARKQ
8.1%

Financial Services

FCUS

-

ARKQ

-

Real Estate

FCUS

-

ARKQ

-

Utilities

FCUS

-

ARKQ
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCUS vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCUS
FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCUSARKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

3.55

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.54

10.75

+8.79

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCUS and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCUSARKQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.25

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.66

+0.47

Drawdowns

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCUS drawdown since its inception was -39.89%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCUS and ARKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCUSARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.89%

-59.89%

+20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-20.58%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.89%

-30.76%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.47%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-17.24%

+9.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

6.78%

-1.85%

Volatility

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) have volatilities of 10.14% and 10.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCUSARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

10.45%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.37%

24.44%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.92%

32.49%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.98%

32.23%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.98%

29.84%

+0.14%

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCUS vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than ARKQ's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.22%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
2.89%4.33%11.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCUS and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to FCUS (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCUS dropped -39.89% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

On 3-year performance, ARKQ leads with 39.07% vs 37.64% for FCUS. On fees, ARKQ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FCUS has been the lower-risk option at 10.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 39.07% return vs 37.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARKQ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.22% for ARKQ.

FCUS is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ARKQ is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pinnacle and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FCUS and 0.75% for ARKQ.

FCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCUS and ARKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer