PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTR vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTR vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return.


FCTR

1D
-0.76%
1M
8.63%
YTD
15.16%
6M
15.25%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

AIRR

1D
0.54%
1M
3.36%
YTD
31.77%
6M
31.32%
1Y
65.82%
3Y*
37.10%
5Y*
25.40%
10Y*
21.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTR vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
15.16%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.94%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.77%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTR and AIRR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.73

The correlation between FCTR and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCTR vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCTR
AIRR

Technology

19.3%
0.5%

Financial Services

18.7%
9.6%

Healthcare

9.4%

-

Industrials

9.4%
84.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.1%

-

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Energy

6.5%
3.8%

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Utilities

4.3%

-

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Technology

FCTR
19.3%
AIRR
0.5%

Financial Services

FCTR
18.7%
AIRR
9.6%

Healthcare

FCTR
9.4%
AIRR

-

Industrials

FCTR
9.4%
AIRR
84.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FCTR
8.5%
AIRR

-

Consumer Defensive

FCTR
8.1%
AIRR

-

Real Estate

FCTR
7.8%
AIRR

-

Energy

FCTR
6.5%
AIRR
3.8%

Basic Materials

FCTR
4.6%
AIRR

-

Utilities

FCTR
4.3%
AIRR

-

Communication Services

FCTR
3.5%
AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTR vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTR vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCTRAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

5.05

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

18.68

-11.02

FCTR vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTR and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCTRAIRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.61

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

1.01

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.67

-0.20

Drawdowns

FCTR vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTRAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-42.37%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-13.09%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-27.95%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-27.95%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-1.86%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-7.43%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.53%

-0.48%

Volatility

FCTR vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) is 6.82%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that FCTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTRAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

7.87%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

19.82%

-7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

25.40%

-7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

25.29%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

26.29%

-4.35%

FCTR vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTR vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.35%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTR and AIRR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to FCTR (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.40% vs 4.29% for FCTR. On fees, FCTR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FCTR has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.40% return vs 4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCTR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AIRR.

FCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

FCTR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FCTR and 0.70% for AIRR.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTR and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer