FCTGX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FCTGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FCTGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCTGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M | -5.64% | 10.58% | 19.92% | 18.39% | -25.72% | 9.89% | 35.65% | 35.62% | -5.10% | 28.28% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTGX achieves a -5.64% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.16%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
FCTGX
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -5.64%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCTGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCTGX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCTGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FCTGX
VOO
FCTGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCTGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 0.98 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 1.50 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.53 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | 7.29 | -3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCTGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.98 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.70 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.78 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.83 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCTGX and VOO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCTGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FCTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M | 7.89% | 7.44% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.26% | 8.90% | 5.81% | 15.13% | 7.17% | 0.81% | 4.23% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FCTGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTGX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTGX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCTGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -33.99% | -27.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -11.98% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.21% | -24.52% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.21% | -33.99% | -5.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.22% | -6.29% | -6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -3.72% | -7.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.52% | +1.14% |
Volatility
FCTGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that FCTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCTGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.41% | 5.29% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.03% | 9.44% | +6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 18.10% | +6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 16.82% | +6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 17.99% | +4.70% |