FCTGX vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCTGX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - FCTGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX returned 14.11%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCTGX charges 1.54%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTGX achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.11%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.

FCTGX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 4.14%
• YTD: 18.31%
• 6M: 16.29%
• 1Y: 37.22%
• 3Y*: 20.17%
• 5Y*: 7.78%
• 10Y*: 14.11%

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M	18.31%	10.58%	19.92%	18.39%	-25.72%	9.89%	35.65%	35.62%	-5.10%	28.28%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTGX and SCHG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009	0.84

The correlation between FCTGX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCTGX	SCHG
Healthcare	27.9%	7.7%
Industrials	25.8%	5.8%
Technology	18.2%	46.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	12.7%
Financial Services	6.7%	6.7%
Energy	3.1%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	1.7%
Basic Materials	2.8%	1.4%
Communication Services	1.3%	16.0%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.5%
Utilities	0.5%	0.4%

Return for Risk

FCTGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTGX

FCTGX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FCTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FCTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FCTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FCTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FCTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCTGX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.60	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.18	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.28	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	1.51	+1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.97	5.04	+6.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTGX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCTGX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	1.60	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.70	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.87	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.84	-0.36

Drawdowns

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTGX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTGX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCTGX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.25%	-34.59%	-26.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.22%	-16.41%	+3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.84%	-23.39%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.21%	-34.59%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.21%	-34.59%	-4.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-1.78%	+1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.60%	-5.20%	-6.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	4.90%	-1.62%

Volatility

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that FCTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCTGX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.47%	3.61%	+2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.32%	11.62%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.18%	15.50%	+5.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.47%	22.27%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.85%	21.55%	+1.30%

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTGX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCTGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FCTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M	6.29%	7.44%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	21.26%	8.90%	5.81%	15.13%	7.17%	0.81%	4.23%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCTGX and SCHG in my portfolio?

FCTGX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCTGX or SCHG?

FCTGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTGX dropped -61.25% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.