FCTGX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FCTGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
FCTGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCTGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M | -0.93% | 10.58% | 19.92% | 18.39% | -25.72% | 9.89% | 35.65% | 35.62% | -5.10% | 28.28% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTGX achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.71%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
FCTGX
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 23.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCTGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCTGX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCTGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FCTGX
SCHG
FCTGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCTGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.76 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 1.24 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.09 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 3.71 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCTGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.76 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.57 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.79 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.79 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCTGX and SCHG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCTGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FCTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M | 7.51% | 7.44% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.26% | 8.90% | 5.81% | 15.13% | 7.17% | 0.81% | 4.23% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FCTGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTGX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTGX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCTGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -34.59% | -26.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -16.41% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.21% | -34.59% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.21% | -34.59% | -4.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.89% | -12.51% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -5.22% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 4.84% | -1.13% |
Volatility
FCTGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) has a higher volatility of 9.91% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that FCTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCTGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.91% | 6.77% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 12.54% | +4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.94% | 22.45% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 22.31% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 21.51% | +1.23% |