FCTGX vs. PXQSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX).
FCTGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. PXQSX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006.
Performance
FCTGX vs. PXQSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCTGX vs. PXQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M | -0.93% | 10.58% | 19.92% | 18.39% | -25.72% | 9.89% | 35.65% | 35.62% | -5.10% | 28.28% |
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 0.43% | -4.50% | 9.63% | 19.10% | -24.29% | 19.50% | 28.16% | 24.87% | -15.95% | 18.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTGX achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than PXQSX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX has outperformed PXQSX with an annualized return of 12.71%, while PXQSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.
FCTGX
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 23.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
PXQSX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCTGX vs. PXQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCTGX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQSX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCTGX vs. PXQSX — Risk / Return Rank
FCTGX
PXQSX
FCTGX vs. PXQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCTGX | PXQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.01 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 0.16 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.02 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 0.06 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 0.13 | +6.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCTGX | PXQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.01 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.02 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.39 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCTGX and PXQSX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCTGX vs. PXQSX - Dividend Comparison
FCTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than PXQSX's 5.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M | 7.51% | 7.44% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.26% | 8.90% | 5.81% | 15.13% | 7.17% | 0.81% | 4.23% |
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 5.79% | 5.81% | 4.90% | 2.99% | 3.37% | 1.76% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 2.54% | 5.32% | 8.89% | 7.58% |
Drawdowns
FCTGX vs. PXQSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTGX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than PXQSX's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTGX and PXQSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCTGX | PXQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -55.56% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -13.25% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.21% | -31.49% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.21% | -37.65% | -1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.89% | -13.69% | +4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -10.29% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 5.85% | -2.14% |
Volatility
FCTGX vs. PXQSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) has a higher volatility of 9.91% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) at 5.71%. This indicates that FCTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXQSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCTGX | PXQSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.91% | 5.71% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 11.75% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.94% | 19.73% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 20.22% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 20.45% | +2.29% |