FCTGX vs. NBGNX
FCTGX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M) and NBGNX (Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX returned 13.69%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for NBGNX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FCTGX charges 1.54%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NBGNX.
Performance
FCTGX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTGX achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's 12.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FCTGX has outperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 13.69%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.36% annualized return.
FCTGX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- YTD
- 20.57%
- 1Y
- 35.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.17%
NBGNX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FCTGX vs. NBGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M | 20.57% | 10.58% | 19.92% | 18.39% | -25.72% | 9.89% | 35.65% | 35.62% | -5.10% | 28.28% |
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund | 12.58% | -4.70% | 9.04% | 15.57% | -19.49% | 18.07% | 24.86% | 29.47% | -6.91% | 15.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCTGX and NBGNX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FCTGX and NBGNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCTGX vs. NBGNX — Risk / Return Rank
FCTGX
NBGNX
FCTGX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCTGX | NBGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.11 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 0.89 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 2.38 | +6.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCTGX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTGX drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than NBGNX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTGX and NBGNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCTGX | NBGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -51.75% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.22% | -10.77% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.84% | -27.51% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.21% | -28.33% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.21% | -34.53% | -4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -4.11% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.53% | -7.15% | -4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 4.04% | -0.51% |
Volatility
FCTGX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M (FCTGX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) at 3.76%. This indicates that FCTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCTGX | NBGNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 3.76% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.97% | 11.36% | +6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.71% | 16.30% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 19.70% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 20.20% | +2.74% |
FCTGX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCTGX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCTGX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison
FCTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, less than NBGNX's 14.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class M | 6.17% | 7.44% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.26% | 8.90% | 5.81% | 15.13% | 7.17% | 0.81% | 4.23% |
NBGNX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund | 14.53% | 16.36% | 2.15% | 3.03% | 11.05% | 10.92% | 3.84% | 5.82% | 12.24% | 13.89% | 11.21% | 18.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCTGX and NBGNX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCTGX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to NBGNX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTGX dropped -61.25% vs NBGNX's -51.75%.
FCTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCTGX and NBGNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer