FCTE vs. DCMT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FCTE (SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCTE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SMI 3Fourteen, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCTE returned 13.55% vs 32.24% for DCMT. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FCTE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

FCTE vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 27.72% return.

FCTE

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: 9.25%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 1Y: 13.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.91%

DCMT

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 8.55%
• 6M: 17.61%
• YTD: 27.72%
• 1Y: 32.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	$337.61K	$272.59K	$201.81K
FCTE SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF	$395.29K	$768.22K	$634.95K

FCTE vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCTE SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF	16.87%	-3.80%	6.19%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	27.72%	6.04%	-0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTE and DCMT is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	-0.07

The correlation between FCTE and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCTE vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCTE

FCTE Risk / Return Rank: 32
FCTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FCTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCTE Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FCTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FCTE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 63
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCTE vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCTE	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.63	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	2.24	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.28	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	1.94	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.74	6.51	-3.77

FCTE vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTE and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCTE vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTE drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTE and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCTE	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.68%	-15.96%	-3.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.85%	-15.96%	+3.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-8.32%	+7.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-3.61%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	4.75%	-0.20%

Volatility

FCTE vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) is 3.40%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that FCTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCTE	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	5.43%	-2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	17.04%	-4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.29%	19.04%	-3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.40%	16.04%	+2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.40%	16.04%	+2.36%

FCTE vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCTE vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

FCTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than DCMT's 2.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.88%	3.67%	1.59%
FCTE SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF	0.08%	0.18%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCTE and DCMT in my portfolio?

FCTE and DCMT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCTE or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to FCTE (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTE dropped -19.68% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, FCTE or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 32.24% vs 13.55% for FCTE. On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, FCTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCTE or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 32.24% return vs 13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCTE or DCMT?

DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FCTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCTE or DCMT?

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.08% for FCTE.

What is the main difference between FCTE and DCMT?

FCTE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: SMI 3Fourteen and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FCTE and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.