FCTE vs. NRSH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FCTE (SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FCTE is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, FCTE returned 13.55% vs 47.62% for NRSH. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCTE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.

Performance

FCTE vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 33.68% return.

FCTE

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: 9.25%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 1Y: 13.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.91%

NRSH

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -4.91%
• 6M: 23.70%
• YTD: 33.68%
• 1Y: 47.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCTE SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF	$395.29K	$768.22K	$634.95K
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	$195.73K	$103.64K	$72.69K

FCTE vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCTE SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF	16.87%	-3.80%	6.19%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	33.68%	12.95%	0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTE and NRSH is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.63

The correlation between FCTE and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCTE vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCTE	NRSH
Technology	30.1%	56.1%
Industrials	25.0%	41.1%
Healthcare	19.9%	-
Communication Services	10.0%	-
Energy	5.0%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FCTE vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCTE

FCTE Risk / Return Rank: 32
FCTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FCTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCTE Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FCTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FCTE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 77
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCTE vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCTE	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.71	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	2.32	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.28	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	3.40	-2.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.74	11.69	-8.95

FCTE vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTE and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCTE vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTE drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTE and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCTE	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.68%	-24.01%	+4.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.85%	-13.84%	+0.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-10.20%	+9.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-5.58%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	4.01%	+0.54%

Volatility

FCTE vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) is 3.40%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that FCTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCTE	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	9.12%	-5.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	23.16%	-10.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.29%	27.47%	-12.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.40%	22.50%	-4.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.40%	22.50%	-4.10%

FCTE vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCTE vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

FCTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than NRSH's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FCTE SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF	0.08%	0.18%	0.18%	0.00%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.31%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCTE and NRSH in my portfolio?

FCTE and NRSH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCTE or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to FCTE (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTE dropped -19.68% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, FCTE or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 47.62% vs 13.55% for FCTE. On fees, NRSH is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FCTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCTE or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 47.62% return vs 13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCTE or NRSH?

NRSH is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FCTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCTE or NRSH?

NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.08% for FCTE.

What is the main difference between FCTE and NRSH?

They also come from different issuers: SMI 3Fourteen and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FCTE and 0.75% for NRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.