FCTDX vs. VT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCTDX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - FCTDX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, FCTDX returned 12.74%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCTDX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

FCTDX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCTDX having a 12.65% return and VT slightly higher at 12.66%.

FCTDX

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 13.16%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 21.86%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 12.66%
• 6M: 13.38%
• 1Y: 29.42%
• 3Y*: 21.22%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTDX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCTDX Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund	12.65%	15.63%	23.13%	26.72%	-17.93%	25.40%	22.20%	29.99%	-5.32%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.66%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTDX and VT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018	0.93

The correlation between FCTDX and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCTDX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTDX

FCTDX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FCTDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FCTDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FCTDX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FCTDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FCTDX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTDX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCTDX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.33	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	3.22	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.42	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	3.05	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.27	13.61	+3.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCTDX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTDX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCTDX	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.33	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.69	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.44	+0.35

Drawdowns

FCTDX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTDX drawdown since its inception was -34.51%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTDX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCTDX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.51%	-50.27%	+15.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.96%	-9.67%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	-16.51%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.92%	-26.38%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-0.51%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-7.02%	+1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	2.17%	-0.28%

Volatility

FCTDX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) is 3.23%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that FCTDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCTDX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	3.74%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	10.17%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	12.70%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.49%	16.04%	+1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.66%	17.23%	+2.43%

FCTDX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCTDX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FCTDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCTDX Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund	1.69%	1.90%	4.33%	2.26%	5.75%	7.90%	2.73%	2.89%	2.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCTDX and VT in my portfolio?

FCTDX and VT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCTDX or VT?

VT has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to FCTDX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTDX dropped -34.51% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCTDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.