PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTDX vs. FIWGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCTDX vs. FIWGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCTDX vs. FIWGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTDX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund
-3.10%15.63%23.13%26.72%-17.93%25.40%22.20%29.99%-5.75%
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
-0.76%6.90%2.14%6.51%-13.71%-0.37%10.21%9.39%1.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTDX achieves a -3.10% return, which is significantly lower than FIWGX's -0.76% return.


FCTDX

1D
3.14%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-3.10%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
16.76%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*

FIWGX

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCTDX vs. FIWGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FIWGX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCTDX vs. FIWGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTDX
FCTDX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FCTDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FIWGX
FIWGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FIWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTDX vs. FIWGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCTDXFIWGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.77

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.09

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

1.41

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.88

4.49

-2.61

FCTDX vs. FIWGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the FIWGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTDX and FIWGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCTDXFIWGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.77

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.07

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.48

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between FCTDX and FIWGX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FCTDX vs. FIWGX - Dividend Comparison

FCTDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than FIWGX's 2.75% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTDX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund
1.96%1.90%4.33%2.26%5.75%7.90%2.73%2.89%2.38%
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
2.75%3.68%4.36%3.79%2.24%1.77%6.83%4.30%0.57%

Drawdowns

FCTDX vs. FIWGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTDX drawdown since its inception was -34.51%, which is greater than FIWGX's maximum drawdown of -18.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTDX and FIWGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTDXFIWGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.51%

-18.42%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-3.25%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-18.42%

-6.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.11%

-1.92%

-4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-5.10%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

1.02%

+4.05%

Volatility

FCTDX vs. FIWGX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) at 1.31%. This indicates that FCTDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIWGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCTDXFIWGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

1.31%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

2.74%

+7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.96%

4.92%

+15.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

6.06%

+11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

5.53%

+14.24%