FCSSX vs. YGLD
FCSSX (Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund) and YGLD (Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF) are both funds - FCSSX is a Commodities fund managed by Fidelity, while YGLD is a Gold fund actively managed by Simplify. Over the past year, FCSSX returned 32.62% vs 23.02% for YGLD. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCSSX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for YGLD.
Performance
FCSSX vs. YGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSSX achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than YGLD's -7.24% return.
FCSSX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- 32.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
YGLD
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -7.14%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCSSX vs. YGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 21.09% | 15.43% | 1.74% |
YGLD Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF | -7.24% | 96.82% | -4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSSX and YGLD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCSSX vs. YGLD — Risk / Return Rank
FCSSX
YGLD
FCSSX vs. YGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCSSX | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.14 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | 0.68 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.93 | 1.55 | +10.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCSSX | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 0.57 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 1.17 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
FCSSX vs. YGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSSX drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than YGLD's maximum drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSSX and YGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSSX | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.04% | -34.23% | -31.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.21% | -34.23% | +27.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.40% | -33.06% | +23.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.20% | -7.91% | -28.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 14.86% | -12.12% |
Volatility
FCSSX vs. YGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) is 4.53%, while Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that FCSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCSSX | YGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 8.70% | -4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 34.68% | -22.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 40.43% | -26.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 39.10% | -23.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 39.10% | -24.76% |
FCSSX vs. YGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than YGLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCSSX vs. YGLD - Dividend Comparison
FCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than YGLD's 19.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund | 2.22% | 2.69% | 12.74% | 4.53% | 128.24% | 41.74% | 0.44% | 1.49% | 6.76% | 0.53% |
YGLD Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF | 19.23% | 12.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCSSX and YGLD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YGLD has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to FCSSX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSSX dropped -66.04% vs YGLD's -34.23%.
FCSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCSSX and YGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer