PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCSSX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCSSX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSSX achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSSX has underperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 6.53%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.


FCSSX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
21.09%
6M
21.06%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
6.53%

FSPSX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.51%
6M
12.14%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSSX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCSSX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund
21.09%15.43%5.36%-8.25%18.11%27.59%-3.11%7.41%-12.10%0.92%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
9.51%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSSX and FSPSX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between FCSSX and FSPSX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCSSX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSSX
FCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSSX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCSSXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

1.47

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.10

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

1.91

+2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.93

7.16

+4.77

FCSSX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSSX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCSSXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.47

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.56

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.57

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.50

-0.40

Drawdowns

FCSSX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSSX drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSSX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCSSXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.04%

-33.69%

-32.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-11.39%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.43%

-13.58%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-29.41%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-33.69%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.40%

-0.45%

-8.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-6.55%

-29.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.03%

-0.29%

Volatility

FCSSX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCSSXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.62%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

12.04%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

14.80%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

15.98%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.34%

16.56%

-2.22%

FCSSX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCSSX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FCSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FSPSX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCSSX
Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund
2.22%2.69%12.74%4.53%128.24%41.74%0.44%1.49%6.76%0.53%0.00%0.00%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.88%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCSSX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPSX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to FCSSX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSSX dropped -66.04% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FCSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCSSX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer