FCSRX vs. USBLX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FCSRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C) and USBLX (USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FCSRX returned 4.40%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for USBLX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCSRX charges 1.70%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for USBLX.

Performance

FCSRX vs. USBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCSRX having a 6.09% return and USBLX slightly higher at 6.39%. Over the past 10 years, FCSRX has underperformed USBLX with an annualized return of 4.40%, while USBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.23% annualized return.

FCSRX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 6.09%
• 6M: 6.21%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: 7.74%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 4.40%

USBLX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 6.22%
• 1Y: 16.95%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCSRX vs. USBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	6.09%	9.27%	4.75%	3.60%	-4.26%	14.68%	2.60%	9.54%	-5.03%	3.02%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	6.39%	10.30%	13.32%	16.10%	-15.82%	14.80%	10.78%	18.46%	-1.95%	13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSRX and USBLX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between FCSRX and USBLX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCSRX vs. USBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCSRX

FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

USBLX

USBLX Risk / Return Rank: 83
USBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
USBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
USBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
USBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
USBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCSRX vs. USBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCSRX	USBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.59	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.68	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.49	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	3.22	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.06	15.48	+1.58

FCSRX vs. USBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the USBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCSRX and USBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCSRX vs. USBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSRX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, roughly equal to the maximum USBLX drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSRX and USBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCSRX	USBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.91%	-33.49%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.76%	-5.24%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.85%	-11.66%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.22%	-20.51%	+7.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.02%	-21.93%	+1.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-0.29%	-2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-4.29%	-0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	1.09%	-0.43%

Volatility

FCSRX vs. USBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) is 1.39%, while USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that FCSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCSRX	USBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	2.40%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.72%	5.26%	-1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.76%	6.50%	-1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.89%	8.69%	-1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.71%	9.11%	-2.40%

FCSRX vs. USBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSRX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than USBLX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCSRX vs. USBLX - Dividend Comparison

FCSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than USBLX's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	3.34%	3.74%	3.86%	4.35%	6.51%	4.53%	1.32%	2.20%	8.51%	1.58%	1.34%	0.66%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	2.24%	1.96%	2.28%	2.11%	1.74%	1.66%	1.88%	1.95%	2.73%	2.16%	2.31%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCSRX and USBLX in my portfolio?

FCSRX and USBLX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCSRX or USBLX?

USBLX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to FCSRX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCSRX dropped -33.91% vs USBLX's -33.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.