FCSPX vs. MIFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX).
FCSPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jun 20, 2006. MIFIX is managed by Miller Investment. It was launched on Dec 31, 2014.
Performance
FCSPX vs. MIFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCSPX vs. MIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSPX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port | -1.35% | 8.13% | 2.78% | 8.48% | -16.25% | -0.95% | 11.90% | 16.59% | -3.05% | 8.03% |
MIFIX Miller Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.64% | 7.11% | 7.31% | 6.88% | -7.72% | 4.32% | 14.22% | 9.79% | -1.91% | 3.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCSPX achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than MIFIX's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FCSPX has underperformed MIFIX with an annualized return of 3.42%, while MIFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.90% annualized return.
FCSPX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.42%
MIFIX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCSPX vs. MIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MIFIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCSPX vs. MIFIX — Risk / Return Rank
FCSPX
MIFIX
FCSPX vs. MIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCSPX | MIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.60 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 2.36 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.84 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 6.91 | -1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCSPX | MIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.60 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.55 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.91 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.90 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSPX and MIFIX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCSPX vs. MIFIX - Dividend Comparison
FCSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than MIFIX's 4.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSPX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port | 4.38% | 4.59% | 3.95% | 3.35% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.51% | 3.95% | 4.88% | 4.09% | 4.30% | 4.59% |
MIFIX Miller Intermediate Bond Fund | 4.20% | 4.59% | 4.08% | 3.60% | 3.62% | 5.87% | 5.16% | 2.36% | 5.16% | 3.90% | 1.48% | 1.78% |
Drawdowns
FCSPX vs. MIFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSPX drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, which is greater than MIFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSPX and MIFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSPX | MIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.68% | -15.58% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -2.68% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.68% | -11.87% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.68% | -15.58% | -7.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -2.68% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -2.08% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.71% | +0.26% |
Volatility
FCSPX vs. MIFIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) at 0.76%. This indicates that FCSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCSPX | MIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 0.76% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 2.06% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10% | 3.22% | +1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 5.09% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 5.40% | +0.81% |