FCSH vs. MKTN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) and MKTN (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCSH is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Federated, while MKTN is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by Federated. Both are actively managed. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FCSH charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for MKTN.

Performance

FCSH vs. MKTN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCSH achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than MKTN's 5.83% return.

FCSH

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 5.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.35%

MKTN

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 3.96%
• 6M: 5.85%
• YTD: 5.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	$23.61K	$21.88K	$31.43K
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF	$689.04K	$500.50K	$628.77K

FCSH vs. MKTN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	0.65%	1.18%
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF	5.83%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FCSH and MKTN is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

FCSH vs. MKTN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCSH

FCSH Risk / Return Rank: 57
FCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 52

MKTN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCSH vs. MKTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCSH	MKTN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.53	—	—

Drawdowns

FCSH vs. MKTN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCSH drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, which is greater than MKTN's maximum drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSH and MKTN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCSH	MKTN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-4.13%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.59%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-1.08%	-1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCSH	MKTN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93%	6.67%	-4.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.87%	6.67%	-3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.87%	6.67%	-3.80%

FCSH vs. MKTN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCSH has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MKTN's 1.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCSH vs. MKTN - Dividend Comparison

FCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than MKTN's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF	4.23%	4.14%	4.44%	2.31%	1.76%	0.04%
MKTN Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF	0.48%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCSH and MKTN in my portfolio?

FCSH and MKTN have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCSH or MKTN?

On fees, FCSH is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCSH or MKTN?

FCSH is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for MKTN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCSH or MKTN?

FCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.48% for MKTN.

What is the main difference between FCSH and MKTN?

FCSH is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while MKTN is Equity Market Neutral. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FCSH and 1.94% for MKTN.