FCSH vs. FDV
FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCSH is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Federated, while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. Both are actively managed. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FCSH charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.
Performance
FCSH vs. FDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FCSH
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 2.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.35%
FDV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.61K | $21.88K | $31.43K | |
| $6.25M | $5.53M | $4.27M |
FCSH vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 0.28% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCSH and FDV is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCSH vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank
FCSH
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCSH vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCSH | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCSH vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCSH drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCSH and FDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCSH | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -3.33% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.57% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -0.97% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | — | — |
Volatility
FCSH vs. FDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCSH | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93% | 13.67% | -11.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 13.67% | -10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 13.67% | -10.80% |
FCSH vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCSH has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCSH vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison
FCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than FDV's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 4.23% | 4.14% | 4.44% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.04% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCSH and FDV have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCSH is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCSH is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
FCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.78% for FDV.
FCSH is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FCSH and 0.50% for FDV.
Find the right allocation for FCSH and FDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer