PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCRIX vs. FSMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCRIX vs. FSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX) and FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCRIX achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than FSMSX's 4.13% return.


FCRIX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.90%
6M
3.68%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*

FSMSX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.31%
YTD
4.13%
6M
4.13%
1Y
8.24%
3Y*
5.44%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCRIX vs. FSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCRIX
FS Credit Income Fund Class I
2.90%7.88%9.57%11.96%-10.70%7.50%8.27%2.47%
FSMSX
FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
4.13%4.13%4.63%5.44%3.17%13.97%-3.66%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FCRIX and FSMSX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between FCRIX and FSMSX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCRIX vs. FSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCRIX
FCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMSX
FSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCRIX vs. FSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX) and FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCRIXFSMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.87

1.57

+1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.15

5.52

+3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

40.39

16.89

+23.50

FCRIX vs. FSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the FSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCRIX and FSMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCRIXFSMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.77

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.13

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.88

-0.01

Drawdowns

FCRIX vs. FSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCRIX drawdown since its inception was -26.74%, which is greater than FSMSX's maximum drawdown of -8.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCRIX and FSMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCRIXFSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.74%

-8.94%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-1.46%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.01%

-4.06%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.33%

-4.13%

-11.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-1.64%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.48%

-0.28%

Volatility

FCRIX vs. FSMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX) is 0.68%, while FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that FCRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCRIXFSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.95%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

2.24%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

2.91%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.22%

4.62%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

4.65%

+1.76%

FCRIX vs. FSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCRIX has a 2.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMSX's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCRIX vs. FSMSX - Dividend Comparison

FCRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than FSMSX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCRIX
FS Credit Income Fund Class I
10.10%10.54%8.27%5.56%3.25%5.62%5.72%2.91%0.00%
FSMSX
FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund
3.96%4.12%2.48%3.61%4.12%3.22%0.77%2.20%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCRIX and FSMSX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMSX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to FCRIX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCRIX dropped -26.74% vs FSMSX's -8.94%.

FSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCRIX and FSMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer