PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCPIX vs. GSLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCPIX vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (FCPIX) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPIX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than GSLC's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPIX has underperformed GSLC with an annualized return of 9.65%, while GSLC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.


FCPIX

1D
4.50%
1M
-3.71%
6M
0.24%
YTD
4.87%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
9.65%
ALL TIME*
7.65%

GSLC

1D
0.58%
1M
0.68%
6M
7.66%
YTD
8.44%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
14.27%
ALL TIME*
14.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$58.04M$61.34M$41.47M

FCPIX vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCPIX
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I
4.87%18.68%8.02%27.64%-26.55%12.26%22.23%32.75%-12.79%35.88%
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
8.44%16.17%24.21%25.09%-18.71%27.17%19.02%30.74%-4.07%22.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPIX and GSLC is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2015

0.80

The correlation between FCPIX and GSLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCPIX vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCPIX
FCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCPIX vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (FCPIX) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCPIXGSLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.24

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

1.72

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

7.26

-5.94

FCPIX vs. GSLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the GSLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPIX and GSLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCPIX vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPIX drawdown since its inception was -67.79%, which is greater than GSLC's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPIX and GSLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCPIXGSLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.79%

-33.69%

-34.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.45%

-9.49%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-18.66%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.24%

-24.90%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.24%

-33.69%

-3.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.33%

-0.72%

-7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.70%

-4.35%

-11.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

2.25%

+2.09%

Volatility

FCPIX vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (FCPIX) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 3.06%. This indicates that FCPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCPIXGSLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.75%

3.06%

+5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

9.69%

+9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

12.44%

+8.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

16.71%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

17.68%

+0.61%

FCPIX vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCPIX vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison

FCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than GSLC's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPIX
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class I
5.18%5.44%0.70%0.36%0.00%3.79%0.11%0.54%0.54%0.21%0.37%0.24%
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.94%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCPIX and GSLC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCPIX has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to GSLC (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPIX dropped -67.79% vs GSLC's -33.69%.

GSLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCPIX and GSLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer