PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCPI vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCPI vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPI achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 8.31% return.


FCPI

1D
-1.23%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
9.35%
6M
6.63%
1Y
19.48%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*

GXLC

1D
-1.32%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
8.31%
6M
7.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPI vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FCPI
Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF
9.35%-0.31%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
8.31%3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPI and GXLC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCPI vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPI
FCPI Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPI vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCPIGXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

FCPI vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCPI vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPI drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPI and GXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCPIGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-9.08%

-28.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-3.05%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-1.54%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

Volatility

FCPI vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCPIGXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

13.85%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

13.85%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

13.85%

+6.27%

FCPI vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCPI vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

FCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCPI
Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF
1.63%1.74%1.29%1.88%1.77%1.19%3.53%0.43%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.65%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FCPI and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FCPI.

FCPI has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.

FCPI tracks Fidelity Stocks for Inflation Factor Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FCPI and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCPI and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer