PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCPGX vs. VISGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCPGX vs. VISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPGX achieves a 25.26% return, which is significantly higher than VISGX's 18.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPGX has outperformed VISGX with an annualized return of 15.78%, while VISGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.05% annualized return.


FCPGX

1D
1.23%
1M
7.49%
YTD
25.26%
6M
21.54%
1Y
44.87%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
15.78%

VISGX

1D
0.30%
1M
3.09%
YTD
18.66%
6M
15.65%
1Y
32.31%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPGX vs. VISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
25.26%11.20%20.56%19.02%-25.34%10.50%36.41%36.31%-4.57%28.99%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
18.66%8.18%14.80%22.91%-28.50%5.58%35.11%32.60%-5.81%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPGX and VISGX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004

0.97

The correlation between FCPGX and VISGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCPGX vs. VISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPGX
FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VISGX
VISGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPGX vs. VISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCPGXVISGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.92

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

10.93

+3.09

FCPGX vs. VISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the VISGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPGX and VISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCPGX vs. VISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPGX drawdown since its inception was -59.11%, roughly equal to the maximum VISGX drawdown of -58.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPGX and VISGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCPGXVISGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.11%

-58.74%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-11.39%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-27.58%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.04%

-38.41%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

-38.70%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.01%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-11.59%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.04%

+0.24%

Volatility

FCPGX vs. VISGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) at 6.94%. This indicates that FCPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCPGXVISGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

6.94%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.31%

15.80%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.24%

20.32%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.68%

23.70%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

23.06%

-0.12%

FCPGX vs. VISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VISGX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCPGX vs. VISGX - Dividend Comparison

FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than VISGX's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
5.10%6.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%19.27%8.19%5.31%14.35%6.88%1.53%4.32%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.34%0.33%0.42%0.56%0.46%0.23%0.35%0.47%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FCPGX and VISGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCPGX has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to VISGX (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPGX dropped -59.11% vs VISGX's -58.74%.

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCPGX and VISGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer