FCO vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. (FCO) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Performance
FCO vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCO vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCO Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. | 14.91% | -40.54% | 5.60% | 54.99% | -23.62% | 2.57% | 11.43% | 25.17% | -10.65% | 22.01% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 9.32% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Fundamentals
FCO:
$42.45M
UTF:
$2.51B
FCO:
$0.68
UTF:
$6.79
FCO:
4.62
UTF:
3.81
FCO:
3.95
UTF:
6.47
FCO:
1.04
UTF:
0.88
FCO:
$10.73M
UTF:
$387.16M
FCO:
$5.77M
UTF:
$388.42M
FCO:
$16.10M
UTF:
$765.72M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCO achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FCO has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 3.02%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.
FCO
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 20.99%
- 1Y
- -35.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.70%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.02%
UTF
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 10.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCO vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
FCO
UTF
FCO vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. (FCO) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCO | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | 0.70 | -1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | 0.97 | -1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.14 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 0.99 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 2.24 | -3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCO | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 | 0.70 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.34 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.49 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.44 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCO and UTF is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCO vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
FCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.67%, more than UTF's 7.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCO Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. | 26.67% | 28.72% | 14.24% | 13.00% | 17.43% | 11.44% | 10.63% | 10.45% | 11.80% | 9.52% | 10.55% | 10.92% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.13% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Drawdowns
FCO vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCO drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCO and UTF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCO | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -72.62% | +15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.98% | -11.99% | -44.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.98% | -30.28% | -26.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.98% | -52.53% | -4.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.99% | -4.42% | -40.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.30% | -10.44% | -5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.89% | 5.29% | +32.60% |
Volatility
FCO vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. (FCO) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 4.56%. This indicates that FCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCO | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 4.56% | +4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.61% | 9.43% | +10.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.33% | 15.70% | +30.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 18.51% | +12.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 23.38% | +3.04% |
Financials
FCO vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities