FCO vs. PDI

In the year-to-date period, FCO achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than PDI's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FCO has outperformed PDI with an annualized return of 8.32%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively lower 7.71% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. (FCO) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the PDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCO and PDI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.55%, less than PDI's 14.32% yield.

The maximum FCO drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, roughly equal to the maximum PDI drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCO and PDI.

Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. (FCO) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) at 2.87%. This indicates that FCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.