FCO vs. GSBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. (FCO) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX).
GSBFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 11, 1994.
Performance
FCO vs. GSBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCO vs. GSBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCO Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. | 14.91% | -40.54% | 5.60% | 54.99% | -23.62% | 2.57% | 11.43% | 25.17% | -10.65% | 22.01% |
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund | -0.56% | 10.42% | 9.32% | 9.64% | -9.53% | 10.50% | 9.53% | 19.38% | -4.92% | 7.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCO achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than GSBFX's -0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FCO has underperformed GSBFX with an annualized return of 3.02%, while GSBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.69% annualized return.
FCO
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 20.99%
- 1Y
- -35.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.70%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.02%
GSBFX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 9.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCO vs. GSBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FCO
GSBFX
FCO vs. GSBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. (FCO) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCO | GSBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | 1.28 | -2.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | 1.74 | -2.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.27 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 1.32 | -1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 6.14 | -7.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCO | GSBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 | 1.28 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.70 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.84 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.69 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCO and GSBFX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCO vs. GSBFX - Dividend Comparison
FCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.67%, more than GSBFX's 5.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCO Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. | 26.67% | 28.72% | 14.24% | 13.00% | 17.43% | 11.44% | 10.63% | 10.45% | 11.80% | 9.52% | 10.55% | 10.92% |
GSBFX Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund | 5.39% | 4.39% | 5.12% | 3.41% | 4.10% | 6.66% | 3.05% | 3.52% | 3.98% | 3.52% | 3.78% | 3.93% |
Drawdowns
FCO vs. GSBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCO drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than GSBFX's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCO and GSBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCO | GSBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -37.04% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.98% | -6.41% | -50.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.98% | -15.94% | -41.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.98% | -23.42% | -33.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.99% | -4.25% | -40.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.30% | -4.20% | -12.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.89% | 1.37% | +36.52% |
Volatility
FCO vs. GSBFX - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Global Income Fund, Inc. (FCO) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) at 2.36%. This indicates that FCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCO | GSBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 2.36% | +6.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.61% | 4.02% | +15.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.33% | 7.47% | +38.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 7.36% | +23.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 7.96% | +18.46% |