PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNSX vs. PZRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNSX vs. PZRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNSX achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than PZRIX's 15.07% return.


FCNSX

1D
0.84%
1M
2.14%
YTD
8.91%
6M
12.70%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*

PZRIX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.37%
YTD
15.07%
6M
17.95%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNSX vs. PZRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
8.91%28.56%9.88%15.95%-6.88%28.62%4.47%27.78%-15.01%10.10%
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
15.07%34.05%3.29%19.31%-9.11%12.08%1.74%15.94%-14.93%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNSX and PZRIX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2017

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between FCNSX and PZRIX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNSX vs. PZRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNSX
FCNSX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FCNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

PZRIX
PZRIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PZRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNSX vs. PZRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCNSXPZRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.53

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

4.17

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

15.05

-4.63

FCNSX vs. PZRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the PZRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNSX and PZRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCNSXPZRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.96

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.66

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.61

+0.02

Drawdowns

FCNSX vs. PZRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNSX drawdown since its inception was -41.47%, roughly equal to the maximum PZRIX drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNSX and PZRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNSXPZRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.47%

-43.53%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-8.18%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-13.81%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.35%

-30.85%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.76%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-8.89%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.26%

-0.15%

Volatility

FCNSX vs. PZRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) is 2.81%, while PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that FCNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNSXPZRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.09%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

8.89%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

11.54%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

15.78%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

16.94%

+1.61%

FCNSX vs. PZRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PZRIX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCNSX vs. PZRIX - Dividend Comparison

FCNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than PZRIX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
1.89%2.06%3.05%3.42%3.12%2.20%2.14%2.24%2.51%1.07%0.00%
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
5.70%6.56%6.70%9.19%8.80%11.99%2.04%6.32%2.80%4.13%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNSX and PZRIX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZRIX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to FCNSX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNSX dropped -41.47% vs PZRIX's -43.53%.

PZRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNSX and PZRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer