FCNSX vs. GTMIX
FCNSX (Fidelity Series Canada Fund) and GTMIX (GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCNSX returned 11.30%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for GTMIX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCNSX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GTMIX.
Performance
FCNSX vs. GTMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCNSX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than GTMIX's 13.12% return.
FCNSX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 17.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- —
GTMIX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- 38.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
FCNSX vs. GTMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNSX Fidelity Series Canada Fund | 5.77% | 28.56% | 9.88% | 15.95% | -6.88% | 28.62% | 4.47% | 27.78% | -15.01% | 10.10% |
GTMIX GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund | 13.12% | 46.17% | 1.54% | 14.96% | -10.13% | 10.71% | 7.50% | 23.35% | -21.23% | 8.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCNSX and GTMIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FCNSX and GTMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCNSX vs. GTMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FCNSX
GTMIX
FCNSX vs. GTMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCNSX | GTMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.54 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 4.93 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | 19.02 | -10.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCNSX vs. GTMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCNSX drawdown since its inception was -41.47%, smaller than the maximum GTMIX drawdown of -58.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNSX and GTMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCNSX | GTMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.47% | -58.31% | +16.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.48% | -7.90% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.13% | -14.11% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.35% | -27.34% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | -1.59% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -12.65% | +7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.04% | +0.11% |
Volatility
FCNSX vs. GTMIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX) at 3.48%. This indicates that FCNSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCNSX | GTMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 3.48% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | 9.95% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.07% | 13.01% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 14.93% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 16.00% | +2.53% |
FCNSX vs. GTMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCNSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GTMIX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCNSX vs. GTMIX - Dividend Comparison
FCNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than GTMIX's 19.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNSX Fidelity Series Canada Fund | 1.94% | 2.06% | 3.05% | 3.42% | 3.12% | 2.20% | 2.14% | 2.24% | 2.51% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GTMIX GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund | 19.83% | 22.43% | 5.94% | 0.36% | 5.44% | 16.55% | 2.25% | 4.13% | 7.25% | 2.96% | 4.05% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCNSX and GTMIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCNSX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to GTMIX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNSX dropped -41.47% vs GTMIX's -58.31%.
GTMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCNSX and GTMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer