GTMIX vs. AWPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX) and AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX).
GTMIX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Jul 28, 1998. AWPAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jun 1, 1994.
Performance
GTMIX vs. AWPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTMIX vs. AWPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTMIX GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund | 8.42% | 46.17% | 1.54% | 14.96% | -10.13% | 10.71% | 7.50% | 23.35% | -21.23% | 28.45% |
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund | -4.95% | 13.57% | -0.32% | 13.09% | -26.80% | 9.20% | 29.55% | 26.88% | -17.50% | 34.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTMIX achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly higher than AWPAX's -4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, GTMIX has outperformed AWPAX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while AWPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.
GTMIX
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 17.91%
- 1Y
- 41.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
AWPAX
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -4.95%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTMIX vs. AWPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTMIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than AWPAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTMIX vs. AWPAX — Risk / Return Rank
GTMIX
AWPAX
GTMIX vs. AWPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX) and AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTMIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.67 | 0.46 | +2.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 0.76 | +2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.10 | +0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 0.53 | +3.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.76 | 2.07 | +14.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTMIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 0.46 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | -0.03 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.33 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.32 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTMIX and AWPAX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GTMIX vs. AWPAX - Dividend Comparison
GTMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.69%, while AWPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTMIX GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund | 20.69% | 22.43% | 5.94% | 0.36% | 5.44% | 16.55% | 2.25% | 4.13% | 7.25% | 2.96% | 4.05% | 3.26% |
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 7.00% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 14.44% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GTMIX vs. AWPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTMIX drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, smaller than the maximum AWPAX drawdown of -63.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTMIX and AWPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTMIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.31% | -63.00% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.24% | -13.44% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -38.13% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -38.13% | -2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.51% | -13.22% | +8.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.75% | -18.85% | +6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 3.45% | -1.07% |
Volatility
GTMIX vs. AWPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX) is 5.97%, while AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) has a volatility of 8.77%. This indicates that GTMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTMIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 8.77% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 12.25% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 17.35% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 17.12% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 16.67% | -0.61% |