PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRSK vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRSK vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRSK achieves a -19.73% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VRSK has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 8.94%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.66% annualized return.


VRSK

1D
-2.65%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
-19.73%
6M
-19.98%
1Y
-43.06%
3Y*
-6.21%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
8.94%

MAR

1D
-0.85%
1M
5.50%
YTD
20.95%
6M
23.16%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
29.47%
5Y*
22.61%
10Y*
19.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRSK vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
-19.73%-18.23%16.00%36.24%-22.33%10.85%39.89%37.92%13.58%18.27%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
20.95%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VRSK and MAR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2009

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between VRSK and MAR has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

VRSK:

$6.56

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

VRSK:

27.28

MAR:

29.53

PEG Ratio

VRSK:

1.49

MAR:

0.77

PS Ratio

VRSK:

8.00

MAR:

3.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRSK:

$3.10B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRSK:

$2.09B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRSK:

$1.46B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRSK vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRSK
VRSK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
VRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRSK vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRSKMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.37

1.71

-3.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.03

2.61

-4.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.30

-0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

3.39

-4.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.37

8.53

-9.90

VRSK vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRSK Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRSK and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRSKMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.37

1.71

-3.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.79

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.60

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.47

+0.07

Drawdowns

VRSK vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRSK drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, smaller than the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRSK and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRSKMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.81%

-75.59%

+24.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.81%

-12.65%

-38.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.81%

-30.50%

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.81%

-30.50%

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.81%

-61.26%

+10.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.83%

-3.14%

-40.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-14.91%

+7.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.06%

5.03%

+26.03%

Volatility

VRSK vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 7.01%. This indicates that VRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRSKMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.08%

7.01%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.28%

20.04%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.48%

26.12%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.31%

28.82%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.01%

32.88%

-8.87%

Dividends

VRSK vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

VRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than MAR's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
1.03%0.80%0.57%0.57%0.70%0.51%0.52%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VRSK vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
782.60M
1.81B
(VRSK) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


VRSK and MAR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRSK has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to MAR (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRSK dropped -50.81% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRSK and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer